In a heart wrenching case, where a girl committed suicide by setting herself on fire due to physical and mental torture committed by her in-laws demanding dowry, the Supreme Court convicted the appellants under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide) and Section 498A (cruelty against a married woman) read with Section 34 IPC based on the dying declaration made by her. Her dying declaration even while suffering burn injuries (70-80%) proved critical in the end, even as her own father and all other witnesses had turned hostile in this case. The Court observed that “dying declaration made while suffering burn injuries upto 70-80% would be acceptable if made consciously. It also summed up the principles related to dying declaration inVikas v. State of Maharashtra. In this case, the conviction under Section 304B (dowry death)could not be sustained, due to lack of a direct connection between the dowry demand and the death. But at the same time, the Court held that“a conviction under Section 498-A can be upheld despite acquittal under section 304-B IPC since the former has a broader scope.” The Court observed that “Omission to frame charge doesn’t disable court from convicting accused for an offence proved by evidence on record.” Therefore, it held that“accused persons are liable to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC though charge was not framed.”