Answer is C is correct. Presumption as to telegraphic messages under Section 88 of Indian Evidence Act, the court may presume that the message forwarded from the telegraph office to the addressee corresponds with a message delivered for transmission but not as to the person by whom such message was delivered. Therefore option (c) is the correct answer.

Answer is A is correct. As per Section 91 in the given facts, evidence is admissible. It states “when the terms of a contract, or of a grant, or of any other disposition of property, have been reduced to the form of a document, and in all cases in which any matter is required by law to be reduced to the form of a document, no evidence shall be given in proof of the terms of such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or of such matter, except the document itself, or secondary evidence of its contents in cases in which secondary evidence is admissible under the provisions hereinbefore contained.” Therefore option (a) is the correct answer.

Answer is B is correct. As per Exception 1 of Section 91 of the act, when a public officer is required by law to be appointed in writing, and when it is shown that any particular person has acted as such officer, the writing by which he is appointed need not be proved. Therefore option (b) is the correct answer.