MCQ 28 March 2024

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (28 March 2024)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- Which of the following sections have been inserted in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
  • (a) Section 376A
  • (b) Section 376B
  • (c) Sections 166A, 166B, 354C
  • (d) All of the above
Answer is D is correct. Criminal Amendment Act 2013 brought major changes in the criminal act related to women related rights. All the above given sections are included by the 2013 Criminal Amendment Act. Therefore option (d) is the correct answer.
Question2:- The Supreme Court of India has observed a clear distinction between dishonestly and fraudulently in the case of
  • (a) Nathu Lal v. State of M.P.
  • (b) Central Bank of India v. Narain
  • (c) Mubarik Ali v. State of Bombay
  • (d) Vimla Devi v. Delhi Administration
Answer is B is correct. Clear distinction between dishonesty and fraudulently has been laid down in the case of Central Bank of India v. Narain. Therefore option (b) is the correct answer.
Question3:- The case R v. Dudley and Stephens is related to the defence of
  • (a) Insanity
  • (b) Intoxication
  • (c) Mistake of fact
  • (d) Necessity
Answer is D is correct. R v. Dudley and Stephens is related to defence of necessity. It is a case wherein the court held that necessity cannot be a defence in murder cases. Killing a person out of necessity cannot be plead as a defence under Section 81 of IPC. Therefore option (d) is the correct answer.
Question4:- Section 153AA has been inserted in the IPC, 1860, by which of the following Criminal Law Amendment Act
  • (a) Act of 2001
  • (b) Act of 2003
  • (c) Act of 2005
  • (d) Act of 2006
Answer is C is correct. Section 153AA has been inserted in the IPC through Criminal Amendment act of 2005. Therefore option (c) is the correct answer.
Question5:- Which of the following case is known as Nasik Conspiracy case?
  • (a) Vinayak Damodar Savarkar’s case
  • (b) Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s case
  • (c) Madhu Limaye’s case
  • (d) None of the above
Answer is A is correct. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar’s case is known as Nasik Conspiracy case. (a)
Question6:- Point out the statement which is wrong.
  • (a) Intentional destruction of property for causing wrongful loss to any person is ‘mischief’
  • (b) Intentionally putting any person in fear of injury and thereby dishonestly inducing him to deliver any property is ‘extortion’.
  • (c) Five or more person conjointly committing robbery amounts to ‘dacoity’.
  • (d) Two or more persons quarrelling anywhere commit ‘affray’.
Answer is D is correct. Affray as per Section 159 IPC is when two or more people disturb the public peace by fighting in a public place. Therefore option (d) is the correct answer.
Question7:- Irresistible impulse is a defence
  • (a) In India
  • (b) In England
  • (c) In India and England both
  • (d) Neither in India nor in England
Answer is D is correct. Irresistible impulse is not a defence in India as well as in England. Therefore option (d) is the correct answer.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result