MCQ 04 October 2024

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (04 October 2024)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- In which one of the following cases the Supreme Court has held that a married daughter with independent sufficient means of her own is liable to maintain her father or mother under Section 125 of the CrPC, 1973?
  • a) Sundeep Chaudhary v. Radha Chaudhary
  • b) Vijay Manohar Arbat v. Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai
  • c) Rewati Bai v. Jogeshwar
  • d) K.V. Rudraian v. B.S. Mudda Gangamma
Answer is B is correct. Refer Section 125 of CrPC, 1973 now Section 144 of the BNSS, 2023. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question2:- Queen Empress v. Abdullah is a leading case on:
  • a) Admission confession
  • b) Confession
  • c) Statement
  • d) Dying declaration
Answer is D is correct. Dying Declaration is a statement made by the person while he was dying and states the reason for his death. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Question 3:- In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that “any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntarily administered test result can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1972?
  • a) Selvi v. State of Karnataka
  • b) C. Muniappam v. State of Tami Nadu
  • c) Sunderlal Kanaiyalal v. State of Maharashtra
  • d) C. Mangesh v. State of Karnataka
Answer is A is correct. Provision under Section 23 of the BSA, 2023. Section 27 talks about how much of information received from accused may be proved. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question4:- In which of the following cases it was held that a person has a right to protection under Section 161 (2) of CrPC against questions, the answers of which would have a tendency to a criminal charge?
  • Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani
  • b) Gian Singh v. State
  • c) Rupan Deol Bajaj v. K.P.S. Gill
  • d) R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration
Answer is A is correct. Section 161 talks about examination of witnesses by police. Now Section 180 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds with this section. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question5:- Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in judgement “Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab”, decided on 10.01.2014 settled controversy regarding law containing in Section ____ of CrPC, 1973?
  • a) 125
  • b) 311
  • c) 319
  • d) 357
Answer is C is correct. Section 319 corresponds with 358 of the BNSS, 2023. This refers to power to proceed against other person appearing to be guilty of offence. Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.
Question6:- The case of Pakala Narayan Swami v. King Emperor relates to:
  • a) Doctrine of estoppel
  • b) Accomplice
  • c) Dying declaration
  • d) Cross examination
Answer is C is correct. Dying Declaration is a statement made by the person while he was dying and states the reason for his death. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Question7:- The case of Sawal Das v. State of Bihar is related to:
  • a) Plea of Alibi
  • b) Rule of Res-gestae
  • c) Rule of Estoppel
  • d) Rule of Res-judicata
Answer is B is correct. The principle embodied in law in Section 6, is usually referred to as the res gestae doctrine. The facts that can be proved as a part of res gestae must be facts other than those in question but must be linked to them. Although hearsay evidence is not admissible, it may be admissible in a court of law when it is res gestae and may be reliable proof. The reason behind this is the spontaneity and immediacy of such a statement that for concoction there is hardly any time. Such a statement must, therefore, be concurrent with the acts that constitute the offense or at least immediately thereafter. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result