Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (11 July 2024)

Question/ Answer

Question1:- Section 2(x) of the Cr.P.C. defines warrant cases as those punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding:

(a) Two years
(b) Three years
(c) Five years
(d) Ten years

Answer is A is correct. According to Section 2 (x) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, warrant cases include cases related to any offense punishable with death, life imprisonment or a term exceeding two years. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.

Question2:- Public Prosecutor’ means a person:—

(a) Appointed under Section 24 of Cr.P.C.
(b) Who wants to act as Public Prosecutor
(c) Appointed under Section 24 of Cr.P.C. and includes any person acting under the direction of a Deputy Director of Prosecution
(d) None of the above

Answer is C is correct. Refer Section 25A (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

Question3:- Under the T.P. Act, 1882 personal obligation to pay mortgage money accrues in-

(a) Usufructuary mortgage
(b) Mortgage by conditional sale
(c) Simple and English mortgages
(d) Simple mortgage only

Answer is C is correct. Refer section 58(b) and (e) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, according to which personal liability to pay the mortgage amount arises only in Simple and English mortgages. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

Question4:- Every offence under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 shall be-

(a) Non-bailable and cognizable
(b) Non-bailable and compoundable
(c) Bailable and non- cognizable
(d) None of the above

Answer is A is correct. According to Section 32 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, every offense will be non-bailable and cognizable. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.

Question5:- Which provision of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with the effect of declaration?

(a) Section 33
(b) Section 35
(c) Section 36
(d) Section 32

Answer is B is correct. Section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with the effect of declaration. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

Question6:- The nature of ‘wagering agreement’ was explained in which case?

(a) Derry v. Peek
(b) Mohribibi v. DharmodasGhosh
(c) Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
(d) Felthouse v. Bindley

Answer is C is correct. The nature of the Paddam agreement was explained in Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

Question7:- Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963 takes within its ambit-

(a) Concealments
(b) Frauds
(c) Mistakes
(d) All of the above

Answer is D is correct. All the given options are correct as per Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.

MCQ 11 July 2024

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (11 July 2024)

Our Courses

Useful Links