Answer is B is correct. The court in this case held that the alleged agreement did not constitute a legal contract, but was only an ordinary domestic arrangement which could not be sued upon. There was no Intention to contract. Mutual promises made in the ordinary domestic relationship of husband and wife do not of necessity give cause for action on a contract. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

Answer is D is correct. Newspaper reports are secondary hearsay evidence which cannot be relied upon until it is proved by further evidences. In Khilumal v. Arjun Das, the Court held that the newspaper reports are mere hearsay and cannot in law be relied upon as the proof of speech. Therefore option (d) is the correct answer.

Answer is C is correct. Section 4(1) states all offences under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired into, tried, and otherwise dealt with according to the provisions hereinafter contained. Therefore option (c) is the correct answer.

Answer is D is correct. According to Sec. 4. The communication of an acceptance is complete- as against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. So, no agreement as the acceptance was never communicated to the proposer. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.

Answer is B is correct. Section 73A which talks about proof as to verification of digital signature was inserted by Act 21 of 2001, Section 92 of Information Technology Act 2000. Therefore option (b) is the correct answer.