Question2:- Which of the following postulates is/are sine qua non for basing a claim on section 53A of the Transfer of property Act, 1882?
- 1. The contract should have been in writing signed by the transferor.
- 2. The transferee should have taken possession of the immovable property covered by the contract.
- 3. The transferee already in possession should have done some act in furtherance of the contract.
- 4. The transferee already in possession may not have done some act in furtherance of the contract.
Question3:- In which of the following cases it was held that the accused cannot use the diary? Neither the accused nor his counsel can requisition the case diary and they cannot claim to go through it?
- 1. State of U.P. vs. Harish Chandra Singh
- 2. Madhu Limaye vs. Union of India
- 3. Mukund Lal vs. Union of India
- 4. J.M. Desai vs. State of Bombay
-