MCQ 01 October 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (01 October 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- According to order 5 rule 15, who is not a member of the family within the meaning of this rule?
  • (a) Father residing in the house.
  • (b) Servant residing in the house.
  • (c) Sister residing in the house.
  • (d) Son of age 18 years residing in the house.
Answer is b is correct. According to explanations given in rule 15 of order 5, servant is not a family member. Therefore, option (b) is correct answer.
Question2:- In case of tangible immovable property of a value less than one hundred rupees or upward, transfer can be made:
  • (a) Only by registered instrument.
  • (b) By delivery of the property.
  • (c) Either by registered instrument or by delivery of property.
  • (d) None of these.
Answer is a is correct. Refer Section 54, TPA 1882 – ‘Sales’ defined. Therefore, option (a) is correct answer.
Question3:- In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the right to ‘reproductive health’ is a part of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • (a) Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. & Ors
  • (b) Mr. X v. Hospital Z
  • (c) Javed v. State of Haryana
  • (d) Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration
Answer is d is correct. The Supreme Court stayed the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Suchita Srivastava vs. Chandigarh Administration, and held that the right to reproduce falls within the right to freedom under Article 21 of the Constitution. Therefore, option (d) is correct answer.
Question4:- A prayer for extension beyond the period of 90 days for filling the written statement–
  • (a) Can be oral.
  • (b) Has to be in writing.
  • (c) Can be either in oral or writing.
  • (d) Neither (a) nor (b) as the time cannot be beyond 90 days.
Answer is c is correct. It must be in writing. Refer order 8 rule 1. Therefore, option (b) is correct answer.
Question5:- Lee v. Knapp, (1967) 2 QB 442, is a leading case on:
  • (a) Literal Rule of Interpretation
  • (b) Golden Rule of Interpretation
  • (c) Mischief Rule of Interpretation
  • (d) Harmonious Construction
Answer is b is correct. The case of Lee v. Knapp is a landmark decision of the Golden Rule of Interpretation. Therefore, option (b) is correct answer.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result