MCQ 08 September 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (08 September 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the written statement can be submitted even after 90 days from the date of service of the summons?
  • (a) Kailash vs Nanhku
  • (b) Harishchandra Bajpayee vs Triloki Singh
  • (c) Salim Bhai vs State of Maharashtra
  • (d) Daryav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Answer is a is correct. The Supreme Court held in the case of Kailash vs Nanhku AIR 2005 SC 2441 that under the proviso to Order 8, Rule 1, the time limit of 90 days can be extended by the defendant for submitting his written statement of defence. The provisions are directive, not prescriptive. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question2:- The doctrine of “Full Faith and Credit” is enshrined in Article ............... of the constitution of India.
  • (a) Article 261
  • (b) Article 368
  • (c) Article 148
  • (d) Article 256
Answer is a is correct. “Doctrine of Full Faith and Credit” is provided under Article 261 of the constitution. Article 261 declares that full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of India to public acts, records and judicial proceedings of the Union and every State. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question3:- Article 338A of the constitution provides for the establishment of a:
  • (a) National Commission for Backward Classes
  • (b) National Commission for Scheduled Castes
  • (c) National Commission for Scheduled Tribes
  • (d) None of the above.
Answer is c is correct. Article 338-A added by the constitution 89th Amendment, 2003 provides for the establishment of a National Commission for the Scheduled Tribes. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Question4:- Which of the following provisions of CPC provides for adjudication of claims and objections to attachment of property?
  • a) Order 21 Rule 59
  • b) Order 21 Rule 58
  • c) Order 21 Rule 57
  • d) None of the above
Answer is b is correct. Refer Order 21 Rule 58 of Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question5:- Which case is specifically known as the “cash for question”?
  • (a) Amarinder Singh vs Punjab Legislative Assembly
  • (b) In re Keshav Singh case
  • (c) Raja Ram Pal vs Honorable Lok Sabha Speaker
  • (d) Rajnath Singh vs Honorable Lok Sabha Speaker
Answer is c is correct. The case of Raja Ram Pal vs Hon’ble Speaker of Lok Sabha AIR 2007 is popularly known as “Cash for Question” Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result