MCQ 17 February 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (17 February 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- A and B make a contract grounded on the erroneous belief that a particular debt is barred by the Indian Law of Limitation. The contract is:
  • (a) Voidable
  • (b) Void
  • (c) Not Voidable
  • (d) Void ab initio
Answer is c is correct. Section 21 Illustration of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Question2:- How many sections are provided in the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013?
  • (a) 30
  • (b) 31
  • (c) 32
  • (d) 33
Answer is a is correct. See Index of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question3:- The historical case of “Raj Kumar Kundu vs. McQueen” is related to?
  • (a) Pending suit
  • (b) Partial hearing
  • (c) Mortgage
  • (d) Visible owner
Answer is d is correct. The case of “Raj Kumar Kundu vs McQueen” deals with Ostensible Owner under section 41 of TPA, 1882. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Question4:- Section 20 of The Specific Relief Act, 1963 was substituted in
  • (a) 2015
  • (b) 2018
  • (c) 2021
  • (d) 2023
Answer is b is correct. Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was substituted in the year 2018. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question5:- The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is embodied in which section of the IEA, 1872?
  • (a) Section 6
  • (b) Section 32
  • (c) Section 106
  • (d) Section 93
Answer is c is correct. The doctrine of ‘res ipsa loquitur’ is embodied under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 which deals with the burden of proof in cases where a fact is within the special knowledge of a person. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.