MCQ 18 August 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (18 August 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- Which constitutional validity issue was raised against Section 9 of HMA in the case of T. Sareetha v. Venkata Subbaiah (1983)?
  • A. It violates Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty)
  • B. It violates Article 19(1)(a) (Freedom of Speech)
  • C. It violates Article 25 (Freedom of Religion)
  • D. It violates Article 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies)
Answer is a is correct. A. It violates Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) Explanation: In T. Sareetha v. Venkata Subbaiah, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held Section 9 unconstitutional as it violates the right to privacy and human dignity under Article 21. However, this view was later overruled.
Question2:- If there is no resumption of cohabitation for one year or more after a decree of judicial separation, either party may:
  • A. Apply for nullity of marriage
  • B. Apply for restitution of conjugal rights
  • C. Apply for divorce under Section 13(1A)(i)
  • D. Apply for maintenance only
Answer is c is correct. C. Apply for divorce under Section 13(1A)(i) Explanation: Section 13(1A)(i) provides that if parties do not resume cohabitation for one year after judicial separation, either may seek divorce.
Question3:- Which of the following remedies is available under the Specific Relief Act?
  • A. Rectification of an instrument
  • B. Rescission of a contract
  • C. Cancellation of an instrument
  • D. All of the above
Answer is d is correct. D. All of the above Explanation: The SRA provides for rectification (Sec 26), rescission (Sec 27), and cancellation (Sec 31).
Question4:- The doctrine of reasonable classification under Article 14 requires:
  • A. Classification must be arbitrary
  • B. Classification must be reasonable and based on intelligible differentia
  • C. Classification must be based on majority preference
  • D. Classification must always be based on religion
Answer is b is correct. B. Classification must be reasonable and based on intelligible differentia Explanation: For a classification to be valid under Article 14, it must (i) be founded on intelligible differentia, and (ii) have a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved.
Question5:- The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 came into force on:
  • A. 1st October 1932
  • B. 1st April 1932
  • C. 1st January 1933
  • D. 15th August 1947
Answer is a is correct. A. 1st October 1932 Explanation: The Act received assent on 8th April 1932 and came into force on 1st October 1932.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result