MCQ 20 September 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (20 September 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question 1- In extortion which is not essential-
  • (a) Putting any person in fear of injury.
  • (b) Such putting must be intentional.
  • (c) Dishonest inducement of such person to deliver any property or valuable security.
  • (d) Such property must be movable.
Answer D is correct. Offence of Extortion may be committed against any property whether movable or immovable. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Question 2:- “Catch up” rule established by the Supreme Court of India relates to which of the following Article of the Constitution?
  • (a) Article 14
  • (b) Article 16(4)
  • (c) Article 15(4)
  • (d) Article 16(4A)
Answer D is correct. Refer Article 16(4A) of Constitution of India. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Question 3:- As per the preamble of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 the purpose of Act is?
  • (a) To consolidate and define the law of evidence
  • (b) To consolidate and to provide for general rules and principles of evidence for fair trial
  • (c) To establish procedural laws for criminal trials
  • (d) To consolidate and establish law for court and court martial
Answer B is correct. The preamble of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 states that the law is meant to consolidate, define, and provide a set of general rules and principles of evidence to ensure a fair trial. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question 4:- The expression ‘former suit’ in the context of rule of res judicata means a suit which has been
  • (a) Instituted prior to the suit in question.
  • (b) Decided prior to the suit in question.
  • (c) Both (a) and (b)
  • (d) Neither (a) nor (b)
Answer B is correct. ‘Former suit’ in the context of rule of res judicata means a suit which has been decided prior to the suit in question. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question 5:- In which of the following cases, the notification of 4th March, 2014 regarding Jat reservation was set aside?
  • (a) Ram Singh v. Union of India
  • (b) Ram Kumar v. Union of India
  • (c) Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. S.D. Agarwal
  • (d) Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
Answer A is correct. Jat reservation was set aside in famous case of Ram Singh v. Union of India. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.