MCQ 26 April 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (26 April 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- In which of the Section of Transfer of Property Act, the ‘Doctrine of Consolidation’ is incorporated?
  • a) Section 60
  • b) Section 61
  • c) Section 62
  • d) Section 63
Answer is b is correct. Refer Section 61 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Question2:- A, who is B’s mukhtar, promises to exercise his influence, as such, with B in favour of C and C promises to pay Rs. 1000 to A. This agreement is void because:
  • (a) It is immoral
  • (b) It is uncertain
  • (c) It is illegal
  • (d) It is incomplete
Answer is a is correct. According to section 23 the consideration or object of an agreement is regarded as immoral or opposed to public policy by court will not be lawful. Given question is illustration (j) under section 23. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question3:- When an ex-parte decree is passed, the defendant would normally ask for setting aside the of ex-parte decree.
  • (a) By an application under Order IX Rule 13 of C.P.C.
  • (b) The filing an revision petition under section 115 of C.P.C.
  • (c) By filling a petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India.
  • (d) By filing an application under Order IX Rule 7 of the C.P.C.
Answer is a is correct. The defendant can file an application under Order 9 Rule 13 to set aside exparte. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Question4:- The provision reating to the appointment of special executive magistrate is provided:
  • (a) Under section 12 of BNSS.
  • (b) Under section 13 of BNSS.
  • (c) Under section 15 of BNSS.
  • (d) Under section 16 of BNSS.
Answer is c is correct. Sec-15 of BNSS. Provides about the provision for appointing special executive magistrate who may be appointed by the state government for such term as it may think fit.Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Question5:- Which of the following case are not related with criminal conspiracy.
  • (a) D.D. Mulchey V/s R.
  • (b) Yakub Memon Vs State of Maharashtra
  • (c) State of M.P. V/s Sheetla Sahai
  • (d) Mahboob Shah V/s Emperor
Answer is d is correct. Mahboob Shah V/s Emperor is related with common intention U/S-3(5) of B.N.S. All other cases are related with Criminal conspiracy. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.

Syllabus

Test Series

Notification

Brochure

Result