MCQ 27 January 2025

Daily MCQs for Judiciary Prelims Exams - (27 January 2025)



Question/ Answer
Question1:- Mark the incorrect statement with regard to consideration under the Indian contract Act, 1872.
  • (a) It is not necessary that consideration should be adequate.
  • (b) Performance of a legal duty is no consideration for a promise.
  • (c) Forbearance to sue is considered as a good consideration.
  • (d) None of the above.
Answer is d is correct. See Section 2(d) read with Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Therefore, option (d) is correct answer.
Question2:- Article 2A of the Constitution, which provided the association of Sikkim with the Union, was omitted by the
  • (a) 35th Amendment
  • (b) 36th Amendment
  • (b) 37th Amendment
  • (b) 38th Amendment
Answer is b is correct. Article 2A of the Indian Constitution was omitted by Section 5 of the Constitution (Thirty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1975. Therefore, option (b) is correct answer.
Question3:- If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract
  • (a) Need to be performed with changes made by alteration.
  • (b) Need not be performed.
  • (c) Becomes voidable.
  • (d) Both (a) and (b)
Answer is b is correct. See Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, making any change in the contract will not require adherence to the original contract. Therefore, option (b) is correct answer.
Question4:- In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the right to ‘reproductive health’ is a part of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • (a) Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. & Ors
  • (b) Mr. X v. Hospital Z
  • (c) Javed v. State of Haryana
  • (d) Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration
Answer is d is correct. The Supreme Court stayed the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Suchita Srivastava vs. Chandigarh Administration, and held that the right to reproduce falls within the right to freedom under Article 21 of the Constitution. Therefore, option (d) is correct answer.
Question5:- The consent under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is not consent when it is given:
  • (a) Under fear of injury
  • (b) Under a misconception of law
  • (c) By a boy of aged below 17 years
  • (d) None of the above
Answer is a is correct. See section 90 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, No consent is a consent which is given under threat of injury, fear or misconception of fact. Therefore, option (a) is correct answer.